H R 3582 in Congressional Session 112

Official Summary

 

Bill Number : H R 3582

 

Title : Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011

 

SUMMARY AS OF:
12/7/2011--Introduced. Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011 - Amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to prepare for each major bill or resolution reported by any congressional committee (except the congressional appropriations committees), as a supplement to CBO cost estimates, a macroeconomic impact analysis of the costs of such legislation for: (1) the period for which the cost estimate is prepared, and (2) the 10-fiscal year period beginning with the first fiscal year after the last fiscal year for which such estimate was prepared and each of the 2 next 10-fiscal year periods. Defines "major bill or resolution" as any bill or resolution whose budgetary effects, for any fiscal year in the period for which a CBO cost estimate is prepared, is estimated to be greater than .25% of the current projected U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) for that fiscal year. Requires the analysis to describe: (1) the potential economic impact of the bill or resolution on major economic variables, including real GDP, business investment, the capital stock, employment, and labor supply; and (2) the potential fiscal effects of the measure, including any estimates of revenue increases or decreases resulting from changes in GDP.

Votes

Title : Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011
Votes in the US Senate
This Bill was not Voted in the US Senate
Votes in the US House
Roll NumberVote DateQuestionDescriptionVote Result
302012-02-02On Passage To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide for macroeconomic analysis of the impact of legislationP
292012-02-02On Motion to Recommit with Instructions To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide for macroeconomic analysis of the impact of legislationF
282012-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment Cicilline of Rhode Island Part B Amendment No. 8F
272012-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment Jackson Lee of Texas Part B Amendment No. 5F
262012-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment Fudge of Ohio Part B Amendment No. 4F
252012-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment Connolly of Virginia Part B Amendment No. 2F
242012-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment Peters of Michigan Part B Amendment No. 1F

Sponsors

 
Congressional Sponsors of H R 3582
 
Bill Number : H R 3582
Title : Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011
Sponsor: Rep Price, Tom [GA-6] (introduced 12/7/2011)      
ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]:     (Sort: by date)Rep Amash, Justin [MI-3] - 1/23/2012 Rep Austria, Steve [OH-7] - 1/27/2012 Rep Barletta, Lou [PA-11] - 1/27/2012 Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. [MD-6] - 12/16/2011
Rep Barton, Joe [TX-6] - 1/18/2012 Rep Bilirakis, Gus M. [FL-9] - 1/30/2012 Rep Black, Diane [TN-6] - 1/27/2012 Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN-7] - 1/18/2012 Rep Bonner, Jo [AL-1] - 1/27/2012 Rep Broun, Paul C. [GA-10] - 12/20/2011
Rep Chaffetz, Jason [UT-3] - 12/7/2011
Rep Cravaack, Chip [MN-8] - 1/27/2012 Rep Culberson, John Abney [TX-7] - 1/18/2012 Rep DesJarlais, Scott [TN-4] - 12/15/2011
Rep Flake, Jeff [AZ-6] - 1/27/2012 Rep Fleming, John [LA-4] - 12/15/2011
Rep Flores, Bill [TX-17] - 12/15/2011
Rep Franks, Trent [AZ-2] - 1/18/2012 Rep Gardner, Cory [CO-4] - 1/30/2012 Rep Garrett, Scott [NJ-5] - 12/7/2011
Rep Gibson, Christopher P. [NY-20] - 1/27/2012 Rep Gingrey, Phil [GA-11] - 1/27/2012 Rep Gosar, Paul A. [AZ-1] - 12/15/2011
Rep Graves, Tom [GA-9] - 1/27/2012 Rep Hanna, Richard L. [NY-24] - 12/15/2011
Rep Harper, Gregg [MS-3] - 1/27/2012 Rep Harris, Andy [MD-1] - 1/18/2012 Rep Hayworth, Nan A. S. [NY-19] - 1/30/2012 Rep Hensarling, Jeb [TX-5] - 12/7/2011
Rep Huelskamp, Tim [KS-1] - 1/18/2012 Rep Hultgren, Randy [IL-14] - 1/27/2012 Rep Johnson, Bill [OH-6] - 1/27/2012 Rep Kingston, Jack [GA-1] - 1/18/2012 Rep Kinzinger, Adam [IL-11] - 12/13/2011
Rep Kline, John [MN-2] - 1/24/2012 Rep Lankford, James [OK-5] - 12/19/2011
Rep Lummis, Cynthia M. [WY] - 12/15/2011
Rep Mack, Connie [FL-14] - 1/30/2012 Rep Manzullo, Donald A. [IL-16] - 1/24/2012 Rep Marchant, Kenny [TX-24] - 12/15/2011
Rep McClintock, Tom [CA-4] - 1/23/2012 Rep McHenry, Patrick T. [NC-10] - 1/18/2012 Rep McKinley, David B. [WV-1] - 1/27/2012 Rep Mulvaney, Mick [SC-5] - 12/15/2011
Rep Paulsen, Erik [MN-3] - 12/13/2011
Rep Pearce, Stevan [NM-2] - 1/18/2012 Rep Pitts, Joseph R. [PA-16] - 1/18/2012 Rep Posey, Bill [FL-15] - 1/18/2012 Rep Quayle, Benjamin [AZ-3] - 1/18/2012 Rep Reed, Tom [NY-29] - 12/19/2011
Rep Ribble, Reid J. [WI-8] - 12/13/2011
Rep Rivera, David [FL-25] - 1/27/2012 Rep Roe, David P. [TN-1] - 12/16/2011
Rep Rokita, Todd [IN-4] - 12/15/2011
Rep Ross, Dennis [FL-12] - 12/20/2011
Rep Ryan, Paul [WI-1] - 12/7/2011
Rep Scalise, Steve [LA-1] - 1/23/2012 Rep Scott, Austin [GA-8] - 1/27/2012 Rep Stivers, Steve [OH-15] - 1/27/2012 Rep Stutzman, Marlin A. [IN-3] - 12/7/2011
Rep Sullivan, John [OK-1] - 1/30/2012 Rep Tiberi, Patrick J. [OH-12] - 1/27/2012 Rep Walberg, Tim [MI-7] - 1/18/2012 Rep Westmoreland, Lynn A. [GA-3] - 12/16/2011
Rep Wilson, Joe [SC-2] - 12/15/2011
Rep Woodall, Rob [GA-7] - 1/18/2012

Other Info

Bill Number : H R 3582
Title : Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011
 
MAJOR ACTIONS:
1
 
2/7/2011 Introduced in House
 
1/30/2012 Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Budget. H. Rept. 112-377, Part I. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order.
 
1/30/2012 Committee on Rules discharged.
 
2/2/2012 Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 242 - 179 (Roll no. 30).
 
2/6/2012 Referred to Senate committee: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
 
ALL ACTIONS:
1
 
2/7/2011:Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. 1
 
2/7/2011:Referred to House Budget
 
1/24/2012:Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held. 1
 
2/7/2011:Referred to House Rules
 
1/25/2012 11:00am:Mr. McHenry asked unanimous consent that the Committee on The Budget have until 3:00 p.m. on Jan. 30 to file a report on H.R. 3582. Agreed to without objection.
 
1/30/2012 3:20pm:Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Budget. H. Rept. 112-377, Part I. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order.
 
1/30/2012 3:20pm:Committee on Rules discharged.
 
1/30/2012 3:20pm:Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 258.
 
2/1/2012 7:37pm:Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 534 Reported to House. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The resolution provides for one hour of debate, each, on H.R. 3578 and H.R. 3582. All points of order against consideration of both H.R. 3578 and H.R. 3582 are waived. For H.R. 3578, the resolution makes in order the amendment printed in Part A of the report accompanying this resolution and for H.R.3582, the resolution makes in order the amendments printed in part B of the report accompanying this resolution.
 
2/2/2012 1:56pm:Rule H. Res. 534 passed House.
 
2/2/2012 2:05pm:Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 534. (consideration: CR H396-419)
 
2/2/2012 2:05pm:Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The resolution provides for one hour of debate, each, on H.R. 3578 and H.R. 3582. All points of order against consideration of both H.R. 3578 and H.R. 3582 are waived. For H.R. 3578, the resolution makes in order the amendment printed in Part A of the report accompanying this resolution and for H.R.3582, the resolution makes in order the amendments printed in part B of the report accompanying this resolution.
 
2/2/2012 2:06pm:House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 534 and Rule XVIII.
 
2/2/2012 2:06pm:The Speaker designated the Honorable Robert J. Dold to act as Chairman of the Committee.
 
2/2/2012 2:06pm:GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3582.
 
2/2/2012 3:17pm:DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters Part B amendment No. 1.
 
2/2/2012 3:24pm:POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Peters amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Peters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
 
2/2/2012 3:25pm:DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly (VA) Part B amendment No. 2.
 
2/2/2012 3:32pm:POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Connolly (VA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
 
2/2/2012 3:32pm:DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Walz Part B amendment No. 3.
 
2/2/2012 3:35pm:DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fudge Part B amendment No. 4.
 
2/2/2012 3:42pm:POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Fudge amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Fudge demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
 
2/2/2012 3:43pm:DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee Part B amendment No. 5.
 
2/2/2012 3:51pm:POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Jackson Lee (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
 
2/2/2012 3:55pm:DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Quigley Part B amendment No. 6.
 
2/2/2012 4:00pm:DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake Part B amendment No. 7.
 
2/2/2012 4:04pm:DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cicilline Part B amendment No. 8.
 
2/2/2012 4:15pm:POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cicilline substitute amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cicilline demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
 
2/2/2012 4:15pm:UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
 
2/2/2012 5:00pm:The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3582.
 
2/2/2012 5:01pm:The previous question was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H417)
 
2/2/2012 5:01pm:The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H404-405)
 
2/2/2012 5:01pm:Mr. Boswell moved to recommit with instructions to the Budget Committee. (consideration: CR H417-418; text: CR H417)
 
2/2/2012 5:03pm:DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Boswell motion to recommit. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add a new subsection entitled "Impacts on Medicare Benefits, Beneficiaries, the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds".
 
2/2/2012 5:09pm:The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H417)
 
2/2/2012 5:26pm:On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 183 - 237 (Roll no. 29).
 
2/2/2012 5:33pm:On passage Passed by recorded vote: 242 - 179 (Roll no. 30).
 
2/2/2012 5:33pm:Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
 
2/6/2012:Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.